Theatre in Description
General data
Course ID: | WH-SP-T-I-2-Teatr-Z |
Erasmus code / ISCED: | (unknown) / (unknown) |
Course title: | Theatre in Description |
Name in Polish: | Teatr w opisie |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Humanities |
Course groups: |
(in Polish) Przedmioty specjalizacyjne dla II roku kulturoznawstwa |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
(not available)
|
Language: | Polish |
Subject level: | elementary |
Learning outcome code/codes: | KU1_W03 KU1_W06 KU1_W15 KU1_W17 KU1_U01 KU1_U02 KU1_U8 KU1_K02 KU1_K09 FP1t_W05 FP1t_U03 FP1t_K04 |
Short description: |
Course level: intermediate Course aims: Understanding contemporary theatre languages considering historical changes of conventions and the theatre poetics; obtaining the skill of analysing stage works; using the analysis of the play as an element of reading its meaning and the base for its interpretation; ability to recognize contemporary ways of theatre communication; obtaining the knowledge about contemporary theatre criticism; acquiring the skill of writing about the theatre, the instruments of reviews and theatre criticism in Poland; obtaining the skill of reading the theatre as an expression of contemporary culture. Prerequisites: The student is supposed to know basic issues of the knowledge about the theatre. |
Full description: |
Course content: The analysis of the stage work - description of individual elements of the performance and presenting its synthetic meaning. Contemporary theatre conventions considering their historical changes. A synthesis of the performance in the theatre - an analysis of modern means of expression (music, art, acting, costumes, literature) and their coexistence in the performance. How to read the meaning of the stage work. Theatre as an important element of cultural discourse. Theatre life - criticism (reviews), conventions, legends - and its influence on the reception of the stage art. Poetics and characteristics of theatre reviews. Description of the performance as a form of theatre records and a testimony of the audience reception. Methods of assessment: to receive credit: an essay with a positive mark. |
Bibliography: |
Sto przedstawień w opisach polskich autorów, red. Z. Raszewski, Wrocław 1993. M. Halberda i in., „Dziady” Adama Mickiewicza w inscenizacji Konrada Swinarskiego. Opis przedstawienia, Kraków 1998. M. Dzieduszycka, Apocalipsis cum figuris. Opis spektaklu, Kraków 1974. P. Pavis, Słownik terminów teatralnych, przeł. S. Świontek, Wrocław 2002. M. Carlson, Performans, przeł. E. Kubikowska, Warszawa 2007; Z. Raszewski, Teatr w świecie widowisk, Warszawa 1991; C. Balme, Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze, przeł. W. Dudzik i M. Leyko, Warszawa 2005; H-T, Lehman, Teatr postdramatyczny, przeł. D. Sajewska, M. Sugiera, Kraków 2004; T. Kowzan, O autonomiczności sztuki widowiskowej, [w:] Problemy teorii dramatu i teatru, pod red. J. Deglera, t. II, Wrocław 2003; D. Ratajczak, Teatralność i sceniczność, [w:] Problemy teorii dramatu i teatru, pod red. J. Deglera, Wrocław 2003, t. I; P. Brook, Pusta przestrzeń, wstęp Z. Hübner, przeł. W. Kalinowski, Warszawa 1981; P. Brook, Ruchomy punkt, przeł. E. Guderian-Czaplińska i G. Ziółkowski, Wrocław-Poznań 2004. |
Efekty kształcenia i opis ECTS: |
1 - know the basic terminology related to cultural anthropology - know topics and problems specific for cultural anthropology - have basic knowledge on major paradigms and attachments of cultural anthropology - understand the scope of the knowledge s/he has apprehended and the need for a life-long learning - can use different databases for searching readings specific for cultural anthropology - can name cultural phenomenon, and use proper methods to anaile it by comparing, - can read and analize texts of culture, - know how participate in culture and know why ist neccesary. ECTS - 2 points 30 h - participation in classes 15 h - participation in common theatrical performances 5 h - reading the litterature 2,5 h - writting diseratations. |
Assessment methods and assessment criteria: |
Essay. Bardzo dobry – student knows modern conventions od theatre, he can adjust method of analyzis to the theatrical perfomrance and compare it with other textes of culture. He can write text in every convention of writing about theatre. Dobry - student knows modern conventions od theatre, he can compare theatrical performance with other textes of culture. He can write text in every convention of writing about theatre. Dostateczny – student knows modern conventions od theatre. He can write text in every convention of writing about theatre. Niedostateczny - student don't knows modern conventions od theatre, he can't adjust method of analyzis to the theatrical perfomrance and compare it with other textes of culture. He can't write text in every convention of writing about theatre. |
Practical placement: |
Doesn't matter |
Copyright by Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw.