Cultural anthropology

elementary

(in Polish) NP2_W10

NP2_U08

NP2_K04

Objectives of the subject: philosophical claryfication of the major phenomena of contemporary culture. Philosophical knowledge provided for the programme of the first cycle education is required.

Substantive content is twofold:

1. Mata -subjective: "What is the philosophical anthropology of culture?"

1.1. Types of anthropology: philosophical and non-philosophical (e.g. psychologic, sociology, Cultural Studies, theology);

1.2. History of discipline (from anthropology topics to an autonomous discipline).

2. Subjective: description and interpretation of the fact of culture.

M. A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z. Zdybicka [i inni], Wprowadzenie do filozofii, Lublin 1996; S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować?, Lublin 1989; tenże, Światopogląd, religia, teologia, Lublin 1998; M. Kurdziałek, Średniowiecze w poszukiwaniu równowagi między arystotelizmem a platonizmem, Lublin !996; M. J. Adler, Dziesięć błędów filozoficznych, Warszawa b.r; M.A. Krąpiec, J. Sochoń, Porzucić świat absurdów, Lublin 2002; S. Swieżawski, Istnienie i tajemnica, Lublin 1993; tenże, Święty Tomasz na nowo odczytany, Poznań 1995; tenże, Dzieje europejskiej filozofii klasycznej, Warszawa – Wrocław 2000; E. Gilson, Bóg i filozofia, Warszawa 1961; tenże, Chrystianizm a filozofia, Warszawa 1958; S. Swieżawski, Wstępy do q. 75- 89 Sth 1, w: Św. Tomasz z Akwinu,Traktat o człowieku, Summa teologii 1, 75 - 89, przeł. i oprac. S. Swieżawski, Warszawa 1998; R. Darowski, Filozofia człowieka. Zarys problematyki. Antologia tekstów, Kraków 2002; W. Chudy, Drugie śniadanie u Sokratesa, Warszawa 2004; K. Wojtyła, Rozważania o istocie człowieka, Kraków 1999; Jan Paweł II, Encyklika Fides et ratio, Rzym 14.09.1998; M. A. Krapiec, U podstaw rozumienia kultury, RW KUL, Lublin 1991, ss. 265; tenże, Filozofia w teologii. Czytając Encyklikę Fides et ratio, Lublin 1999; tenże, O Filozofii, Lublin 2008; A. Maryniarczyk; Dla-czego tomizm? Lublin 2001; J. Ratzinger, Wiara, prawda, tolerancja, Kielce 2005; Z.J. Zdybicka, Jan Paweł II – filozof i mistyk, Lublin 2009; taż, Bóg czy sacrum, Lublin 2007.

(K) A student defines the essence of philosophical cognition of culture (an objective, a method, a subject); distinguishes types of humanistic cognition of culture (differences of subjects, methods, objectives); points to changes taking place in humanistic interpretation of culture in history.

(S) A student can formulate in philosophical language the problems relating to observed socio-cultural phenomena;

(C) A student demonstrates care in the use of philosophical language, obtains basic sensitivity to cultural problems.

STUDENT’ACTIVITY and hour labour inputs

Lecture hours .......................................... 30

Preparing for classes, reading ................ 15

Sitting for an exam ......................... 15

____________________________________________

Total number of ECTS credits 2

A Forming Evaluation:

– for grade 2 (unsatisfactory) – A student does not know the definitions of the basic concepts of philosophical anthropology, ethics.

- for grade 3 (satisfactory) – A student correctly demonstrates knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), however has no ability to analyze the relationships between cultural phenomena selected in a philosophical description;

- for grade 4 (good) – A student not only properly presents knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), but is able to make basic comparisons of philosophical, psychological, sociological, pedagogical interpretation of culture.

- for grade 5 (very good) – A student not only compares various interpretation of the fact of culture (philosophical, educational, psychological, sociological, Cultural Studies, pedagogical), but can draw conclusions from the made comparisons and relate them to contemporary culture and educational practice .

A Final: lecture course attendance and delivering a PowerPoint presentation on one of the major phenomena of contemporary culture.