(in Polish) Pozycja prawna aktorów w starożytnym Rzymie
General data
Course ID: | WP-MON-PO-S-PpawsRZ |
Erasmus code / ISCED: | (unknown) / (unknown) |
Course title: | (unknown) |
Name in Polish: | Pozycja prawna aktorów w starożytnym Rzymie |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Law and Administration |
Course groups: | |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
(not available)
|
Language: | Polish |
Subject level: | intermediate |
Learning outcome code/codes: | enter learning outcome code/codes |
Short description: |
1. Introduction, legal and literary sources. 2. Cause of actors' infamy and applying rules 3. The effects of actors’ infamy 4. Groups of people treated differently by law: women, personae probrosae, honestiores and humiliores. 5. Actors in the family law. 6. Actors in the law of succession. 7. Actors in the law of obligations – question of trust. 8. Status of actors in the procedural law. 9. Actors in the public law 10. Unusual legal position offamous actors. 11. Influence of the social status of the actors on their legal position. |
Full description: |
The purpose of the course is to show the social and juridical status of stage people in ancient Rome, both in public and private law, from the times of the Republic (first appearance of actors in Rome) to the reign of Justinian – the end of the development of Roman law. It will be demonstrated what the significance of being an actor in Rome was. It is very probable that their status was specific only due to the profession they performed and the lack of reputation alleged with it, disgrace recognised and somehow reinforced by law. There is also an obvious difference in the ancient legal status of men and women, the difference was possibly deeper between actors and actresses, as there exist some source-texts insinuating this point of view. Moreover, it would be precised, what the reason of the specific status of actors was and whether this status was the same for every stage person. Was this caused by morality, by fear of the actors’ influence on the mind of the audience, or by yet another reason? |
Bibliography: |
Main sources: Gaius, Institutions The Codification of Justinian The Theodosian Code Livy, History of Rome Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae Cicero, In Defence of Quintus Roscius the Comoedian. Main Literature: A.H.J. GREENIDGE. Infamia, Its Place in Roman Public and Private Law, Oxford 1984 P. EASTERLING, E. HALL (red.), Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession, CUP 2002, M. KOCUR, We władzy teatru. Aktorzy i widzowie w antycznym Rzymie, Wrocław 2005 More references will be given during the course |
Efekty kształcenia i opis ECTS: |
Student: EK1: Has a knowledge of Roman law concerning actors EK2: Understands and explains the relationship between the social and juridical position of actors EK3: Is able to independently analize the different types of sources of law |
Assessment methods and assessment criteria: |
Student: For grade 2 EK1: Hasn't a knowledge of Roman law concerning actors EK2: Can not understand and explain the relationship between the social and juridical position of actors EK3: Isn't able to analize the different types of sources of law For grade 3 EK1: Has a basic knowledge of Roman law concerning actors EK2: Understands and explains the relationship between the social and juridical position of actors EK3: Is able to analize the different types of sources of law with help For grade 4 EK1: Has a good knowledge of Roman law concerning actors EK2: Understands and explains the relationship between the social and juridical position of actors EK3: Is able to independently analize the different types of sources of law For grade 5 EK1: Has a very good knowledge of Roman law concerning actors EK2: Perfectly understands and explains the relationship between the social and juridical position of actors EK3: Is able to independently and creatively analize the different types of sources of law |
Practical placement: |
Copyright by Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw.