Introduction into Jurisprudence

elementary

PR_U01

PR_U04

PR_K02

PR_K03

PR_U01 graduate can use the rules of logical reasoning and interpretation of contemporary or historical legal texts, especially sources of law, also in the context of specific legal events.

PR_U04 graduate can use his/her theoretical knowledge of public/private/international law to describe, analyse and solve specific cases

PR_K02 is ready to correctly identify and resolve dilemmas related to the performance of legal professions

PR_K03 is ready to work in a group, to cooperate and assume various roles and to participate in the preparation of social projects, including legal, economic and political aspects

Description ECTS

participation in the exercises: 30 h

Reading the given texts before classes: 30 h

learning for the colloquium: 10 h

3 ECTS points (approx. 70h)

A Grade 2 means, that a student:

EK1 do not know the definition of the basic concepts of jurisprudence.

EK2 do not know the origin, creation and construction of normative acts.

EK3 Is not able to use the rules of legal interpretation and inference.

EK4 Is not able to develope a draft of a simple normative act .

EK5 Is not able to discuss and maintain openness to arguments in difficult cases, concerning the relationship of law and morality.

EK6 Is not able to work in a team making decisions about interpretation of law.

A Grade 3 means, that:

EK1 Gives one definition of the basic concepts of jurisprudence.

EK2 Knows the origin, creation and types of legislation within the internal systematics of normative acts.

EK3 Uses at least two rules of interpretation of different types of rules of interpretation, and at least two rules of inference.

EK4 Develops a simple project of normative act based on the basic principles of lawmaking.

EK5 Discusses keeping elementary principles of ethics of speech and openness to arguments discussing during seminar the hard cases, perceives types of relationships between law and morality.

EK6 works satisfactorily arranging relationships in the group and actually reading the quoted resolution concernig the interpretation of law.

A Grade 4 means, tha a student:

EK1 gives at least two definitions of basic concepts of jurisprudence.

EK2 know the origin of the sources of law, characterized by legislative procedure, characterizes and identifies the example of types of legislation within the internal systematics of normative acts.

EK3 Uses all basic rules of legal interpretation and inference.

EK4 Develops project of a simple normative act and uses all the rules of legislative technique, in particular in the field of designing adapting and transitional provisions, the rules for appointing unit of the legal act, rules of punctuation and citation of official journals.

EK5 Discusses maintaining principles of ethics of speech and openness to arguments in the discussion of the various hard cases, perceives and identifies conflicts between law and morality and is oriented to their settlement.

EK6 works as a team in a conciliatory way, by taking the right decisions concerning interpretation of law, based on analysis of real judgments of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court.

A Grade 5 means, tha a student:

EK1 gives several definitions of basic concepts of jurisprudence and shows the relationships between them.

EK2 know the origin of the sources of law and characterizes them in different types of legal systems, characterized by the formation of a procedure other than the statute types of acts of legal system, characterizes different types of normative acts as such in the Polish legal system and in the point of views of comparativistics and characterizes, identifies on examples, and knows the detailed rules of constructing different types legal provisions within the internal systematics of normative acts.

EK3 Uses all basic rules of interpretation and legal inferences and criticizes the various possible solutions about interpretation of law.

EK4 Develops projects of simple normative acts and uses all the rules of legislative technique, performs the basic argumentation for statements of reasons of the project of a simple normative act.

EK5 Discusses maintaining principles of ethics of speech and openness to arguments in the debate on the most complex and current hard cases, perceives and identifies conflicts between law and morality, is oriented to their settlement.

EK6 Works in a team and also has the ability to manage it while keeping the social skills to work in groups, taking the right decisions of interpretation of law based on critical analysis of the real decisions of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to indicate different possible and acceptable ways of interpretation.