Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie - Centralny System UwierzytelnianiaNie jesteś zalogowany | zaloguj się
katalog przedmiotów - pomoc

From modern transcendental of knowledge to the post-modern transcendental of language WF-FI-BASTI-ER
Wykład monograficzny (WYK_MON) Semestr zimowy 2017/18

Informacje o zajęciach (wspólne dla wszystkich grup)

Liczba godzin: 30
Limit miejsc: 20
Literatura:

• Course Textbook:

Basti G. (2017). An ontology for our information age. A paradigm shift in science and philosophy, Aracne Edition, Rome. (available in ebook format since Fall 2017).

• Other texts (many of them will be downloadable in the online course viewer):

Abramsky, S., & Tzevelekos, N. (2011). Introduction to categories and categorical logic. In B. Coecke (Ed.), New structures for physics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 813 (pp. 3-94). Berlin-New York: Springer.

Anellis, I. H. (1995). Peirce rustled, Russell pierced: how Charles Peirce and Bertrand Russell viewed each other's work in logic, and an assessment of Ruseell's acuuracy and role in the historiography of logic. Modern Logic, 5, 270-328.

Apel, K. O. (1984). Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Basti, G. (2012). Philosophy of Nature and of Science. Vol. I: The Foundations. Translated by Ph. Larrey. Retrieved May 31, 2016, from http://www.irafs.org/courses/materials/basti_fil_nat.pdf

Basti, G. (2017a). The Post-Modern Transcendental of Language in Science and Philosophy, in Epistemology and the Transformation of Knowlege, E. Lipovic (Ed.), Rijeka (CR): InTech Publisher (In Press).

Basti, G. (2017b). From formal logic to formal ontology. The new dual paradigm in natural sciences, Analecta Husserliana. Vol. CXXI: "New Perspectives of Metaphysics from Phenomenology of Life in Our Post-Modern Times" (In Press).

Brady, G. (2000). From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science BV.

Burch, R. (2014, December). Charles Sanders Peirce. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/peirce.

Deely, J. (1985). Tractatus de Signis. The Semiotic of John Poinsot. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Deely, J. (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. The First Postmodern Survey of Philsophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Toronto, ON: Toronto UP.

Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 400, 97–117.

Dreyfus, H. (1982). Husserl’s perceptual noema, in Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science , Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 97-124.

Goranko, V., & Otto, M. (2007). Model theory of modal logic. In P. Blackburn, F. J. van Benthem, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Handbook of Modal Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 252-331.

Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus Postmodernity. (S. Ben-Habib, Ed.) New German Critique (Special Issue on Modernism), 22, 3-14

Husserl, E. (1891a). Besprechung: Schröder, Ernst, 'Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik. (Exakte Logik). I Band. Leipzig, B. G.Teubner. 1890'. In Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen (pp. 243-78). Göttingen

Husserl, E. (1891b). Der Folgerungskalkuül und die Inhaltslogik, Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschafliche Philosophie, 15 (1891), 168-89.

Husserl, E. (1901). Logical Investigations. Vol. 2, Dermot Moran (Ed.), transl. by John N. Findlay , London & New York: Routledge , 1970.

Husserl, E. (1929). Formal and Transcendental Logic, transl. by Dorion Cairns, The Hague (NL): Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.

Husserl, E. (1934-37). The Crisis of European Sciences and Trascendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, transl. by David Carr , Evanston (IL): Northwerstern UP , 1970.

Krauss, L. M. (2012). A universe from nothing. Why there is something rather than nothing. Afterward by Richard Dawkins. New York: Free Press

Peirce, C. S. (1868). Nominalism versus Realism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 57-61. Retrieved February 29, 2016, from http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/writings/v2/w2/w2_14/v2_14.htm

Peirce, C. S. (1868). On a New List of Categories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 7, 287-298. Tratto il giorno April 27, 2016 da http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/menu/library/bycsp/newlist/nl-main.htm

Peirce, C. S. (1897). The logic of relatives. The Monist, 7(2), 161-217. Tratto il giorno February 29, 2016 da http://www.jstor.org/stable/27897407

Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 35, 1637–1678.

Schröder, E. (1890). Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik. (Exakte Logik). I Band. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.

Tarski, A. (1941). On the calculus of relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73-89.

Tarski, A. (1948). Abstract: Representation Problems for Relation Algebras. Bulletin of the AMS, 54, 80.

Tarski, A., & Givant, S. (1987). A Formalization of Set Theory without Variables. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Van Benthem, J. (1984). Correspondence theory. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. II (pp. 167-247). Dordrecht, NL: Reidel.

Van Benthem, J. (2010). Modal Logic for Open Minds. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.

Vattimo, G. (1985). La fine della modernità. Milano: Garzanti.

Venema, Y. (2007). Algebras and co-algebras. In P. Blackburn, F. J. van Benthem, & F. Wolter (A cura di), Handbook of modal logic (p. 331-426). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier.

Von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

Metody i kryteria oceniania:

Preparation of a written work of at least 20 pages on some sources of the course bibliography, and previously agreed with the professor.

Zakres tematów:

1 The present age as a “communication age” and the role of philosophy: nihilist vs. constructivist post-modernity

2 The notion of “transcendental” and the “four ages of understanding” (J. Deely) in Western thought

3 The modern transcendental of knowing and its intrinsic relationship with modern physics and calculus. I

4 The modern transcendental of knowing and its intrinsic relationship with modern physics and calculus. II

5 Husserl and Peirce: phenomenological (epistemic) vs. semiotic (algebraic) formal ontology of predicate logic

6 The intentional version of the transcendental of knowing in Husserl and the foundations of logic and mathematics. I

7 The intentional version of the transcendental of knowing in Husserl and the foundations of logic and mathematics. II

8 The intentional version of the transcendental of knowing in Husserl and the foundations of logic and mathematics. III

9 Ch. S. Peirce’s semiotic completion of the linguistic turn, and the overcoming of the linguistic conventionalism I

10 Ch. S. Peirce’s semiotic completion of the linguistic turn, and the overcoming of the linguistic conventionalism II

11 A path for a synthesis: J. Poinsot’s semiotic Interpretation of Aquinas’ theory of truth and of its categorical duality. I

12 A path for a synthesis: J. Poinsot’s semiotic Interpretation of Aquinas’ theory of truth and of its categorical duality. II

13 An unexpected outcome: the triadic structure of E. Stein’s formal ontology as synthesis of Husserl and Aquinas

14 An updated taxonomy of formal ontologies for our communication age and the role of formal philosophy

15 A conclusion: conscious (human) and unconscious (artificial) agents of communication in our age

Grupy zajęciowe

zobacz na planie zajęć

Grupa Termin(y) Prowadzący Akcje
1 (codziennie od poniedziałku do piątku), 9:00 - 10:30, sala 309
(codziennie od poniedziałku do piątku), 10:45 - 12:15, sala 309
Gianfranco Basti, Adam Świeżyński, Andrzej Waleszczyński, Agnieszka Szymańska szczegóły
Wszystkie zajęcia odbywają się w budynku:
Kampus Wóycickiego Bud. 23
Opisy przedmiotów w USOS i USOSweb są chronione prawem autorskim.
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie.