Methods of assessment:
Activities during the courses, presentation, paper
Criteria of assessment
PR_U01
Inssufficient mark (2)
Graduate can not interprete any historical legal texts, especiallu sources of law, also in the context of concrete legal cases
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate can interprete simple historical legal texts, especiallu sources of law, also in the context of concrete legal cases
Good mark (4)
Graduate can interprete historical legal texts, especiallu sources of law, also in the context of concrete legal cases
Very good mark (5)
Graduate can outstandingly interprete historical legal texts, especiallu sources of law, also in the context of concrete legal cases
PR_U05
evaluation methods: oral reports, tests, paper
Inssufficient mark (2)
Graduate can not relate his knowledge about different legal domains to describing, explaining and evaluation of historical events in areas of world economy, culture and societies
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate can relate his knowledge about different legal domains to basic describing, explaining and evaluation of historical events in areas of world economy, culture and societies
Good mark (4)
Graduate can relate his knowledge about different legal domains to describing, explaining and evaluation of historical events in areas of world economy, culture and societies
Very good mark (5)
Graduate can outstandingly relate his knowledge about different legal domains to describing, explaining nd evaluation of historical events in areas of world economy, culture and societies
PR_U07
evaluation method: paper
Insufficient mark (2)
Graduate can not write legal analisis of historical questions
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate can write legal analisis of simple historical questions
Good mark (4)
Graduate can write legal analisis of historical questions
Very good mark (5)
Graduate can write legal analisis of difficult and complicated historical questions
PR_U09
Methods of evaluation: oral reports, discussion during the courses
Insufficient mark (2)
Graduate can not prepare oral legal analisis of historical questions
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate can prepare oral legal analisis of simple historical questions
Good mark (4)
Graduate can prepare oral legal analisis of historical questions
Very good mark (5)
Graduate can preprae oral legal analisis of difficult and complicated historical questions
PR_K01
methods of evaluation discussion during the courses, continous assessment
Insufficient mark (2)
Graduate is not ready to complement and perfect his knowledge about processes of historical development of norms and legal institutions
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate is somehow ready to complement and perfect his knowledge about processes of historical development of norms and legal institutions
Good mark (4)
Graduate is ready to complement and perfect his knowledge about processes of historical development of norms and legal institutions
Very good mark (5)
Graduate is perfectly ready to complement and perfect his knowledge about processes of historical development of norms and legal institutions
PR_K03
methods of evaluation: discussion during the courses, continous assessment
Insufficient mark (2)
Graduate is not ready to work in group, collaboration and taking different roles and participation in preparing social projects,taking into account legal, economic and historical aspects
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate is basically ready to work in group, collaboration and taking different roles and participation in preparing social projects,taking into account legal, economic and historical aspects
Good mark (4)
Graduate is ready to work in group, collaboration and taking different roles and participation in preparing social projects,taking into account legal, economic and historical aspects
Very good mark (5)
Graduate is perfectly ready to work in group, collaboration and taking different roles and participation in preparing social projects,taking into account legal, economic and historical aspects
PR_K04
methods of evaluation: discussion during the courses, continous assessment
Insufficient mark (2)
Graduate is not ready to define priorities in concrete law action, taking automically or in group
Sufficient mark (3)
Graduate is basically ready to define priorities in concrete law action, taking automically or in group
Good mark (4)
Graduate is ready to define priorities in concrete law action, taking automically or in group
Very good mark (5)
Graduate is perfectly ready to define priorities in concrete law action, taking automically or in group
|