Theology of misticism

podstawowy

STL_U01;

STL_U02;

STL_U03;

STL_K02;

A scientific seminar on Theology of Spirituality conducts research in the field of broadly understood Spirituality and Mysticism. Research is focused on learning about scientific and research methods in this field, constructing scientific work, and assessing the specificity of research sources.

1. Locus theologicus in Spirituality.

2. Methodology in theology.

3. Methodology in Theology of Spirituality.

4. Interdisciplinarity - relation to other areas of Theology.

5. Relation to non-Theological sciences

6. Criteria for science.

7. Constructing a work of plan.

8. Outlining the research problem.

9. Elements of the introduction.

10. Chapters of work.

11. Building completion.

12. Preparation of a bibliography

1. Wiliam McNamara, Christian Mysticism A Psychotheology, Chicago 1981

2. Philip Sheldrake, Explorations in Spirituality, New Yersey 2010.

3. Illtyd Trethowan, Mysticism and Theology, London 1974.

4. William Johnston, Mystical Theology. The Science and Love, New York 1995.

5. Evelyn Underhill, Mysticism, New York 1955.

6. Jordan Aumann, Spiritual Theology, London 1980.

7. Mark McIntosh, Mystical Theology. The Integrity of Spirituality and Theology, Oxford 1998.

8. R. Garrigou Lagrange, Three Ages of the Spiritual Life, trans. Sr. Timothea Doyle, London 1948.

9. The Cloud of Unknowing, Published September 1st 2004 by HarperSanFrancisco: HarperCollins Spiritual Classics.

10. Julian of Norwich, Revelations of Divine Love, Published August 27th 1998 by Penguin Classics

11. John of the Cross, Dark Night of the Soul, London, 2012.

12. John of the Cross, Ascent of Mount Carmel, London, 2012.

13. John of the Cross, Spiritual Canticle of the Soul and the Bridegroom Christ, London, 2012.

14. John of the Cross, The Collected Works of St John of the Cross (Eds. K. Kavanaugh and O. Rodriguez), Washington 1991.

15. Teresa of Ávila, Way of perfection, London, 2012.

16. Teresa of Ávila, The Interior Castle ,Doubleday, 1972.

17. Shirley du Boulay, Teresa of Avila: An Extraordinary Life , Bluebridge, 1995

18. Stein, Edith, The Science of the Cross (translated by Sister Josephine Koeppel, O.C.D. The Collected Works of Edith Stein, Vol. 6, ICS Publications, 2011.

19. Stein, Edith, The Science of the Cross, trans. S. Josephine Koeppel, O.C.D. The Collected Works of Edith Stein, Volume Six, 1983.

20. Wojtyła, K. Faith According to St. John of the Cross, San Francisco 1981.

EK. 1. Scope of knowledge: The student acquires the necessary knowledge to undertake scientific work. Learns the methods of scientific work at the master's level; recognizes and qualifies the material on the basis of specific research methods in the field of Theology; has knowledge of the formal and methodological structure of scientific work; explains and summarizes the collected material both in terms of the issue he / she undertakes, as well as in the issues proposed for work within the framework of a scientific seminar.

EK 2. Scope of skills. The student uses the acquired knowledge. On its basis, he analyses the collected research material; draws up an appropriate plan of scientific work; constructs material working systems; verifies his own research and participates in the verification of the work of other students; sets the criteria and properties for the prepared works and studies.

EK 3. At the level of competence. The student has a proper critical attitude towards the content being developed; expresses his opinions and joins discussions during the classes; works in teams preparing scientific material; takes responsibility for the content presented as scientific achievements; he is creative in the face of new concepts of scientific work based on Theology.

EK 1. From the scope of knowledge:

Ndst (unsatisfactory - 2): has no basic knowledge of scientific work; does not know what a scientific seminar is all about.

Dst (satisfactory - 3): has basic knowledge of scientific work; knows elementary methods of scientific work, can collect research material and classify it.

Db (good - 4); is interested in the issues raised; prepares interesting issues for work in the seminar; he mastered research methods well.

Bdb (very good -5): develops scientifically; proposes new topics and new solutions; has its own concepts of developing the issues discussed during the seminar.

EK 2. In terms of skills:

Ndst (unsatisfactory - 2): has no basic scientific work skills; cannot create his own research workshop.

Dst (satisfactory - 3): has the ability to properly develop the researched scientific material.

Db (good - 4): proposes and introduces solutions to theological problems; is active in discussions at the seminar; looking for answers to the problems posed.

Bdb (very good -5): can propose original topics of scientific work and have concepts of their development; looking for new methods of scientific work; develops its scientific and research workshop.

EK 3. As part of social competences:

Ndst (unsatisfactory - 2): sees no possibility of using the acquired knowledge.

Dst (satisfactory - 3): implements the known material briefly and in general, does not develop methods of scientific and research work, remaining at the basic level.

Db (good - 4): has the ability to use a research workshop for solutions that have ecclesial or general social significance.

Bdb (very good -5): can work interdisciplinary; keeps track of changes in science and its methods. He comes out with initiatives for new solutions.

Methods of verifying the learning outcomes: demonstrating the scientific achievements at each stage of the scientific seminar

- The condition for completing the course is achieving the assumed educational goals.

- The number of points obtained from:

- achievements and advancement in research work: dst-dst plus 50-60%, db-db plus 60-85%, very good 85-100%

- attendance at classes: dst- from 65%; db-65-95%, very good-95-100%

- substantive, methodological and formal evaluation of the selected scientific publication.