Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

From mind to life - contemporary discussion

General data

Course ID: WF-FI-123-WMSFT-P21
Erasmus code / ISCED: 08.1 Kod klasyfikacyjny przedmiotu składa się z trzech do pięciu cyfr, przy czym trzy pierwsze oznaczają klasyfikację dziedziny wg. Listy kodów dziedzin obowiązującej w programie Socrates/Erasmus, czwarta (dotąd na ogół 0) – ewentualne uszczegółowienie informacji o dyscyplinie, piąta – stopień zaawansowania przedmiotu ustalony na podstawie roku studiów, dla którego przedmiot jest przeznaczony. / (0223) Philosophy and ethics The ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) code has been designed by UNESCO.
Course title: From mind to life - contemporary discussion
Name in Polish: WMSF: Od umysłu do życia - współczesna debata
Organizational unit: Institute of Philosophy
Course groups: (in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczelnianych - obszar nauk humanistycznych i społecznych (studia I st. i JM)
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): 4.00 Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.
Language: Polish
(in Polish) Dyscyplina naukowa, do której odnoszą się efekty uczenia się:

philosophy

Subject level:

elementary

Learning outcome code/codes:

FI1_W06; FI1_W08; FI1_W09; FI1_U10;

Short description:

The aim of the lecture is to acquaint students with contemporay Bayesian models used in the philosophy of mind, cognitve sciences and life sciences. The lecture is introductory.

Full description:

The aim of the lecture is to acquaint students with contemporay Bayesian models used in the philosophy of mind and cognitve sciences and life scienceas. During the lecture, the student will learn the content and meaning of the Bayesian rule, the first Bayesian models in psychology and cognitive science, rational analysis; predictive coding, predictive processing, active inference and a model based on the free energy principle. The selected models will be analyzed in terms of their explanatory powers, rationality and normativity.

Bibliography:

Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 471–517.

Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J. (2012). Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026450.

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X12000477.

Colombo, M., Elkin, E., Hartmann, S. (2018). Being realist about Bayes and the predictive processing theory of mind. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axy059, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy059.

Elqayam, S., Evans, J. S. (2011). Subtracting ,,ought” from ,,is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(5), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1100001X.

Fink, S. B., Zednik, C. (2017). Meeting in the dark room: Bayesian rational analysis and hierarchical predictive coding. W: T. Metzinger, W. Wiese (eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing, 8, 1–13. Frankfurt am Main: MI ND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573154.

Friston, K. J. (2012). A free energy principle for biological systems. Entropy, 14, 2100–2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/e14112100.

Friston, K. J., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 1–49.

Gigerenzer, G., Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.

Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. W: R. Sun (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational cognitive modeling (1–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hahn, U. (2014). The Bayesian boom: Good thing or bad? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(765), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765.

Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hohwy, J. (2020). New directions in predictive processing. Mind & Language, 2(35), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12281.

Kwisthout, J., van Rooij, I. (2019). Computational resource demands of a predictive Bayesian brain. Synthese, first online, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00032-3.

Lee, T. S., Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Optical Society of America, 20(7), 1434–1448.

Litwin, P., Miłkowski, M. (2020). Unification by fiat: Arrested development of predictive processing. Cognitive Science, 7(44), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12867.

Oaksford, M. (2014). Normativity, interpretation and Bayesian models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(332), 1–5.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00332.

Oaksford, M., Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Orlandi, N. (2016). Bayesian perception is ecological perception. Philosophical Topics, 44(2), 327–351.

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Piekarski, M. (2020. Mechanizmy predykcyjne i ich normatywność. Liberi Libri. Warszawa.

Ramstead, M. J. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., Friston, K. J. (2019). A tale of two densities: Active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behavior, first online, 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1177/1059712319862774.

Rescorla, M. (2015). Bayesian perceptual psychology. W: M. Matthen (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception (694–716). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Spratling, M. W. (2017). A review of predictive coding algorithms. Brain and Cognition, 112, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.003.

Wiese, W., Metzinger, T. (2017). Vanilla PP for philosophers: A primer on predictive processing. W: T. Metzinger, W. Wiese (eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing, 1, 1–18. Frankfurt am Main: MI ND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573024.

Efekty kształcenia i opis ECTS:

Knowledge:

1. the student knows and understands the historical character of the emergence and use of Bayesian models;

2. the student knows the ideas and arguments used by the supporters of the use of Bayesian models;

3. the student understands and recognizes the problems related to the use of Bayesian models in science and philosophy.

Skills:

1. the student reads and interprets philosophical texts on Bayesian models;

2. the student sees and recognizes the philosophical problems associated with the use of Bayesian models.

Competences:

1. the student knows the scope of his knowledge in the field of Bayesian philosophy;

2. the student understands the need for continuous learning and development in the field of philosophical issues presented during classes

ECTS [1 ECTS = 30 (25) hours]:

participation in the lecture: 0-30 hours

reading of texts: 30-60 hours

preparation for the exam: 60-90 hours

Total hours (average): 120 [120/30 (25) = 4]

Number of ECTS: 4

Assessment methods and assessment criteria:

Oral exam based on the lectures and recommended reading material.

The final grade is the weighted average of the grade for attendance (1/3), preparation for classes, knowledge of the ordered reading and preparation of the paper (1/3) and the grade for the final exam (1/3).

Practical placement:

n/a

Classes in period "Summer semester 2021/22" (past)

Time span: 2022-02-01 - 2022-06-30
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Lectures, 30 hours, 35 places more information
Coordinators: Michał Piekarski
Group instructors: Michał Piekarski
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Course - examination
Lectures - examination
(in Polish) E-Learning:

(in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy

Type of subject:

obligatory

(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych:

(in Polish) PO/H1 - obszar nauk humanistycznych - I stopień/JM

Short description:

The aim of the lecture is to acquaint students with contemporay Bayesian models used in the philosophy of mind, cognitve sciences and life sciences. The lecture is introductory.

Full description:

The aim of the lecture is to acquaint students with contemporay Bayesian models used in the philosophy of mind and cognitve sciences and life scienceas. During the lecture, the student will learn the content and meaning of the Bayesian rule, the first Bayesian models in psychology and cognitive science, rational analysis; predictive coding, predictive processing, active inference and a model based on the free energy principle. The selected models will be analyzed in terms of their explanatory powers, rationality and normativity.

Bibliography:

Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 471–517.

Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J. (2012). Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026450.

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X12000477.

Colombo, M., Elkin, E., Hartmann, S. (2018). Being realist about Bayes and the predictive processing theory of mind. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axy059, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy059.

Elqayam, S., Evans, J. S. (2011). Subtracting ,,ought” from ,,is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(5), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1100001X.

Fink, S. B., Zednik, C. (2017). Meeting in the dark room: Bayesian rational analysis and hierarchical predictive coding. W: T. Metzinger, W. Wiese (eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing, 8, 1–13. Frankfurt am Main: MI ND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573154.

Friston, K. J. (2012). A free energy principle for biological systems. Entropy, 14, 2100–2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/e14112100.

Friston, K. J., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 1–49.

Gigerenzer, G., Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.

Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. W: R. Sun (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational cognitive modeling (1–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hahn, U. (2014). The Bayesian boom: Good thing or bad? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(765), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765.

Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hohwy, J. (2020). New directions in predictive processing. Mind & Language, 2(35), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12281.

Kwisthout, J., van Rooij, I. (2019). Computational resource demands of a predictive Bayesian brain. Synthese, first online, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00032-3.

Lee, T. S., Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Optical Society of America, 20(7), 1434–1448.

Litwin, P., Miłkowski, M. (2020). Unification by fiat: Arrested development of predictive processing. Cognitive Science, 7(44), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12867.

Oaksford, M. (2014). Normativity, interpretation and Bayesian models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(332), 1–5.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00332.

Oaksford, M., Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Orlandi, N. (2016). Bayesian perception is ecological perception. Philosophical Topics, 44(2), 327–351.

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Piekarski, M. (2020. Mechanizmy predykcyjne i ich normatywność. Liberi Libri. Warszawa.

Ramstead, M. J. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., Friston, K. J. (2019). A tale of two densities: Active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behavior, first online, 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1177/1059712319862774.

Rescorla, M. (2015). Bayesian perceptual psychology. W: M. Matthen (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception (694–716). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Spratling, M. W. (2017). A review of predictive coding algorithms. Brain and Cognition, 112, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.003.

Wiese, W., Metzinger, T. (2017). Vanilla PP for philosophers: A primer on predictive processing. W: T. Metzinger, W. Wiese (eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing, 1, 1–18. Frankfurt am Main: MI ND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573024.

Wymagania wstępne:

Basic knowledge in philosophy of mind and epistemology.

Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw.
ul. Dewajtis 5,
01-815 Warszawa
tel: +48 22 561 88 00 https://uksw.edu.pl
contact accessibility statement mapa serwisu USOSweb 7.0.4.0-1 (2024-05-13)