Print syllabusLogic
General data
| Course ID: | WH-FK-I-1-Logika |
| Erasmus code / ISCED: | (unknown) / (unknown) |
| Course title: | Logic |
| Name in Polish: | Logika |
| Organizational unit: | Faculty of Humanities |
| Course groups: | |
| ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
2.00
|
| Language: | Polish |
| Subject level: | elementary |
| Learning outcome code/codes: | FK1_W07 FK1_U03 FK1_U08 FK1_K04 |
| Short description: |
The aim of the course: getting to know the rudiments of the formal logic and methodology. Students should develop the ability to think logically. i.e. to carry out reasoning in accordance with the rules of logical implication; to evaluate their own and other people’s propositions for their logical correctness; to formulate their thoughts precisely and critically analyse notions and statements; to argue and hold a discussion effectively. |
| Full description: |
Factual content: The subject matter of the course: I Introduction: General nature of logic as a science. Formal logic. II Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic character of a language: Language and its functions. Syntactic rules of a language. Syntactic cohesion. Expressions and their meaning. Syntactic categories of expressions. III Name as a syntactic category: Name and its meaning. Designatum of the name, the scope and types of the name. Semantic relations. Equivalence and ambiguity of names. Ways of using names. Sharp and vague names, clear and unclear names. Relations between the scopes of names. IV More important mistakes in expressing thoughts verbally: Expression ambiguity error. Equivocation. Amphibology. Error resulting from using the names of unclear meaning. Implicit statement error. V Logical sentence as a syntactic category: Sentence and proposition. Logical value of a sentence. Logical truth. Analytic and synthetic sentences. Simple sentences. Compound sentences. VI Elements of the theory of definition: The issue of a definition. Nominal and real definitions. Nominal definitions. The structure of a definition. Basic types of definitions. Conditions of word definition correctness. Errors in defining. Real definitions. VII Logical division VIII Sentential calculus: Introduction. Logical relations among sentences. The relation of the logical contradiction of sentences. The contradiction principle and the law of excluded middle (tertium non datur). The relation of logical equivalence of sentences. The relation of logical entailment of sentences. A conditional. Interferential entailment. Basic principles of the logic of sentence resulting from a logic entailment relation. The laws which result from the relation of mutual exclusion and complementing alternative and disjunctive sentences. Laws (tautologies) of the propositional calculus. A binary method. Axiomatic form of the propositional calculus. Selected laws of the propositional calculus. IX Traditional formal logic. Name calculus: Forms of direct inference. Classic categorical sentences. The Aristotle’s square. The Aristotle’s square laws – logical relations between classic categorical sentences. Conversion of categorical sentences. Obversion of categorical sentences. Forms of indirect inference. Sylogistics. The notion and basic forms of syllogism. Conditions of syllogistic scheme correctness. Checking the schemes using the Venn diagrams. Imperfect syllogisms. X Elements of the quantification logic: Symbolism and basic schemes of the quantification logic. Basic tautologies of the quantification logic. XI The rudiments of the set theory and the relations theory: Basic notions and symbolism of the set theory. Relations between sets. Operations performed on sets. The laws of the set calculus. Boolean algebra of sets – axiomatic system of the set calculus. The division of sets. The rudiments of the relation theory. Basic notions of the relation theory. Types of relations. XII Inference and conditions of its correctness: The notion of inference. Recognising and substantiating a theorem. The principle of a sufficient reason. Logical inference. Conditions of logical inference correctness. Deductive inference. Prima facie inference. Reduction inference. Inductive inference. Inductive research process. The notion of inductive inference. Mathematical induction. Inference by incomplete enumeration. Inference through complete enumeration. Inference by analogy. Statistical inference. Eliminative induction. Mill’s canons. Errors in reasoning. XIV Convincing as a particular form of inference: Reliable and unreliable methods of arguing and having a dispute. |
| Bibliography: |
Literatura podstawowa: Kazimierz Pawłowski, Podstawy logiki ogólnej, Warszawa 2016. Zygmunt Ziembiński, Logika praktyczna, Warszawa 2007. Barbara Stanosz, Wprowadzenie do logiki formalnej. Podręcznik dla humanistów, Warszawa 1998 (lub inne wydanie). |
| Efekty kształcenia i opis ECTS: |
The aim of a basic course of logic is the development and growth of student’s natural rationality, showing them natural rules and patterns of human thinking and present the fundamental knowledge of formal logic and methodology. The effect of logic course should be the development of student’s logical thinking skill, which is thinking with accordance to logical implication; and also the knowledge of how to assess their own opinions and the opinions of others, while using them to create a theory on their logical correctness; the skill of forming precise thoughts and critical analysis of concepts and sentences; effective argumentation and discussing with rules of correct reasoning. Logic course conveys also the knowledge about mistakes and dangers of human thinking, which may appear because of cultural superstitions or prejudice and also other deliberate action like different forms of indoctrination (political, religious or any other). Student should also be able to use knowledge of logic in his/her practical life to assess and address social, ethical and religious issues. Above all the student should be able to distinguish consequences resulting from apparent and real truths (including the skill to distinguish positive elements of cultural tradition from cultural superstition and myths); being able to distinguish what is permanent and unchangeable (for example human dignity and one’s value as a person and as a creator of political, social, economic, religious and any other culture) from what is a part of variable cultural tradition, of which he is the creator. At the same time he will be respectful to culture as a whole, and will try see and free what is noble and what can develop himself. Student should also be able to use rules of logical thinking in his professional life in a natural way; should be able to see and assess important, related, and apparent issues. |
| Assessment methods and assessment criteria: |
Marks are based: on the engagement presented by the student, on how well prepared for the class he/she is, on the attendance and on the practical use of the knowledge of methodology and logic acquitted during the classes. Logical thinking, while using the rules acquired during the classes, is a huge asset. For the satisfactory mark student should present his knowledge of solving basic tasks and logical problems. For the good and very good mark student should be able to solve more difficult task and problems, which require a deeper knowledge of methodology and logic, in range/scope of the material acquired during the classes. Final mark also takes into account the diligence and engagement presented by the student during the classes and also task done by the student at home. Marks are given based on written exams, oral answers, homework and student’s general involvement into the classes. Written exams will verify student’s skills and knowledge accordingly, on a basic level (marks up to satisfactory plus) and more advanced level (marks up to good plus). Student who attended and who were careful during classes shouldn’t have problems solving problems at a basic level. More advanced tasks require from student to be more active during the classes. Mark very good is given to those students who solved the problems at a more advanced level and who can explain the tasks using the knowledge of rules and laws, which they acquired during the classes. They also should show they involvement into the class and they knowledge of the material. The lecturer can, but does not have to, increase the final grade (most often by one grade), even to a very good mark, based on the engagement and involvement of the student into the class, even if the mark directly result from written exams. |
| Practical placement: |
(in Polish) Nie ma praktyk z logiki. |
Classes in period "Winter semester 2021/22" (past)
| Time span: | 2021-10-01 - 2022-01-31 |
 
MO TU W TH FR CW
|
| Type of class: |
Classes, 30 hours
|
|
| Coordinators: | Kazimierz Pawłowski | |
| Group instructors: | Kazimierz Pawłowski | |
| Students list: | (inaccessible to you) | |
| Examination: |
Course -
examination
Classes - graded credit |
|
| (in Polish) E-Learning: | (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy |
|
| (in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS: | ECTS credits: 30 h - exercises - 1 point 30 h - preparation for exercises - 1 point |
|
| Type of subject: | obligatory |
|
| (in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych: | (in Polish) nie dotyczy |
|
| Short description: |
The aim of the course: getting to know the rudiments of the formal logic and methodology. Students should develop the ability to think logically. i.e. to carry out reasoning in accordance with the rules of logical implication; to evaluate their own and other people’s propositions for their logical correctness; to formulate their thoughts precisely and critically analyse notions and statements; to argue and hold a discussion effectively. |
|
| Full description: |
Factual content: The subject matter of the course: I Introduction: General nature of logic as a science. Formal logic. II Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic character of a language: Language and its functions. Syntactic rules of a language. Syntactic cohesion. Expressions and their meaning. Syntactic categories of expressions. III Name as a syntactic category: Name and its meaning. Designatum of the name, the scope and types of the name. Semantic relations. Equivalence and ambiguity of names. Ways of using names. Sharp and vague names, clear and unclear names. Relations between the scopes of names. IV More important mistakes in expressing thoughts verbally: Expression ambiguity error. Equivocation. Amphibology. Error resulting from using the names of unclear meaning. Implicit statement error. V Logical sentence as a syntactic category: Sentence and proposition. Logical value of a sentence. Logical truth. Analytic and synthetic sentences. Simple sentences. Compound sentences. VI Elements of the theory of definition: The issue of a definition. Nominal and real definitions. Nominal definitions. The structure of a definition. Basic types of definitions. Conditions of word definition correctness. Errors in defining. Real definitions. VII Logical division VIII Sentential calculus: Introduction. Logical relations among sentences. The relation of the logical contradiction of sentences. The contradiction principle and the law of excluded middle (tertium non datur). The relation of logical equivalence of sentences. The relation of logical entailment of sentences. A conditional. Interferential entailment. Basic principles of the logic of sentence resulting from a logic entailment relation. The laws which result from the relation of mutual exclusion and complementing alternative and disjunctive sentences. Laws (tautologies) of the propositional calculus. A binary method. Axiomatic form of the propositional calculus. Selected laws of the propositional calculus. IX Traditional formal logic. Name calculus: Forms of direct inference. Classic categorical sentences. The Aristotle’s square. The Aristotle’s square laws – logical relations between classic categorical sentences. Conversion of categorical sentences. Obversion of categorical sentences. Forms of indirect inference. Sylogistics. The notion and basic forms of syllogism. Conditions of syllogistic scheme correctness. Checking the schemes using the Venn diagrams. Imperfect syllogisms. X Elements of the quantification logic: Symbolism and basic schemes of the quantification logic. Basic tautologies of the quantification logic. XI The rudiments of the set theory and the relations theory: Basic notions and symbolism of the set theory. Relations between sets. Operations performed on sets. The laws of the set calculus. Boolean algebra of sets – axiomatic system of the set calculus. The division of sets. The rudiments of the relation theory. Basic notions of the relation theory. Types of relations. XII Inference and conditions of its correctness: The notion of inference. Recognising and substantiating a theorem. The principle of a sufficient reason. Logical inference. Conditions of logical inference correctness. Deductive inference. Prima facie inference. Reduction inference. Inductive inference. Inductive research process. The notion of inductive inference. Mathematical induction. Inference by incomplete enumeration. Inference through complete enumeration. Inference by analogy. Statistical inference. Eliminative induction. Mill’s canons. Errors in reasoning. XIV Convincing as a particular form of inference: Reliable and unreliable methods of arguing and having a dispute. |
|
| Bibliography: |
Kazimierz Pawłowski, Podstawy logiki ogólnej, Warszawa 2016. Zygmunt Ziembiński, Logika praktyczna, Warszawa 2007. Barbara Stanosz, Wprowadzenie do logiki formalnej. Podręcznik dla humanistów, Warszawa 1998 (lub inne wydanie). |
|
Classes in period "Winter semester 2022/23" (past)
| Time span: | 2022-10-01 - 2023-01-31 |
MO TU CW
W TH FR |
| Type of class: |
Classes, 30 hours
|
|
| Coordinators: | Beata Gaj, Kazimierz Pawłowski, Joanna Zajkowska | |
| Group instructors: | Kazimierz Pawłowski | |
| Students list: | (inaccessible to you) | |
| Examination: |
Course -
examination
Classes - graded credit |
|
| (in Polish) E-Learning: | (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) |
|
| (in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS: | ECTS credits: 30 h - exercises - 1 point 30 h - preparation for exercises - 1 point |
|
| Type of subject: | obligatory |
|
| (in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych: | (in Polish) nie dotyczy |
|
| Short description: |
The aim of the course: getting to know the rudiments of the formal logic and methodology. Students should develop the ability to think logically. i.e. to carry out reasoning in accordance with the rules of logical implication; to evaluate their own and other people’s propositions for their logical correctness; to formulate their thoughts precisely and critically analyse notions and statements; to argue and hold a discussion effectively. |
|
| Full description: |
Factual content: The subject matter of the course: I Introduction: General nature of logic as a science. Formal logic. II Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic character of a language: Language and its functions. Syntactic rules of a language. Syntactic cohesion. Expressions and their meaning. Syntactic categories of expressions. III Name as a syntactic category: Name and its meaning. Designatum of the name, the scope and types of the name. Semantic relations. Equivalence and ambiguity of names. Ways of using names. Sharp and vague names, clear and unclear names. Relations between the scopes of names. IV More important mistakes in expressing thoughts verbally: Expression ambiguity error. Equivocation. Amphibology. Error resulting from using the names of unclear meaning. Implicit statement error. V Logical sentence as a syntactic category: Sentence and proposition. Logical value of a sentence. Logical truth. Analytic and synthetic sentences. Simple sentences. Compound sentences. VI Elements of the theory of definition: The issue of a definition. Nominal and real definitions. Nominal definitions. The structure of a definition. Basic types of definitions. Conditions of word definition correctness. Errors in defining. Real definitions. VII Logical division VIII Sentential calculus: Introduction. Logical relations among sentences. The relation of the logical contradiction of sentences. The contradiction principle and the law of excluded middle (tertium non datur). The relation of logical equivalence of sentences. The relation of logical entailment of sentences. A conditional. Interferential entailment. Basic principles of the logic of sentence resulting from a logic entailment relation. The laws which result from the relation of mutual exclusion and complementing alternative and disjunctive sentences. Laws (tautologies) of the propositional calculus. A binary method. Axiomatic form of the propositional calculus. Selected laws of the propositional calculus. IX Traditional formal logic. Name calculus: Forms of direct inference. Classic categorical sentences. The Aristotle’s square. The Aristotle’s square laws – logical relations between classic categorical sentences. Conversion of categorical sentences. Obversion of categorical sentences. Forms of indirect inference. Sylogistics. The notion and basic forms of syllogism. Conditions of syllogistic scheme correctness. Checking the schemes using the Venn diagrams. Imperfect syllogisms. X Elements of the quantification logic: Symbolism and basic schemes of the quantification logic. Basic tautologies of the quantification logic. XI The rudiments of the set theory and the relations theory: Basic notions and symbolism of the set theory. Relations between sets. Operations performed on sets. The laws of the set calculus. Boolean algebra of sets – axiomatic system of the set calculus. The division of sets. The rudiments of the relation theory. Basic notions of the relation theory. Types of relations. XII Inference and conditions of its correctness: The notion of inference. Recognising and substantiating a theorem. The principle of a sufficient reason. Logical inference. Conditions of logical inference correctness. Deductive inference. Prima facie inference. Reduction inference. Inductive inference. Inductive research process. The notion of inductive inference. Mathematical induction. Inference by incomplete enumeration. Inference through complete enumeration. Inference by analogy. Statistical inference. Eliminative induction. Mill’s canons. Errors in reasoning. XIV Convincing as a particular form of inference: Reliable and unreliable methods of arguing and having a dispute. |
|
| Bibliography: |
Kazimierz Pawłowski, Podstawy logiki ogólnej, Warszawa 2016. Zygmunt Ziembiński, Logika praktyczna, Warszawa 2007. Barbara Stanosz, Wprowadzenie do logiki formalnej. Podręcznik dla humanistów, Warszawa 1998 (lub inne wydanie). |
|
Copyright by Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw.
